Tuesday, June 21, 2022

BREW DAY XXII: White Citra Hop Tea + Simcoe Hop Water

Having recently consumed a case of The Citra Bomb One from Hoplark, I've fallen down the hop tea/water rabbit hole. I've always enjoyed sparkling water, but the addition of hops really changes the game. I've increasingly been finding myself in situations where I'm wanting a beer, but don't want the accompanying buzz, and hop tea has filled that niche perfectly. Since my first pint from Hoplark, I've been grabbing up as many other hop waters as possible, like Lagunitas Hoppy Refresher, Shorts' Thirst Mutilator, and I'm convinced. The problem is that all of these options sell at a similar price points as their craft beers, and I figured I could make my own at a significant price break.

Despite scouring the web for resources, hop tea does not support the same fervent community as homebrewing does. r/hopwater is probably a good jumping off point, but its not very active. There are a few recipes scattered about, but most people either keg their output, or store it in the refrigerator. I do not have that type of equipment or fridge space, so I took it upon myself to figure out how to create a shelf stable hop water by force.

The first problem was to get a good tasting recipe. There are recipes galore, but few document the target IBUs or volumes of CO2. To land on a reasonable bitterness goal, I started with a very quick experiment where I steeped some hop pellets in an Aeropress for varying durations. The results were honestly terrible, being both overly bitter, but also scratchy in the throat. In reflection I'm quite sure this is due to the brewing method though. The Aeropress forces water through the hops as you expel the water, which I believe brought out some of the hops' bad qualities. The lower dose samples were okay, so for my first carbonated batch I landed on a 10 IBU target. As for volumes of CO2, I aimed high at 3.8, which is equivalent to a German style weizen. Unfortunately, a beer with such intense carbonation exceeds the .5% limit required to deem a beverage non-alcoholic, but .7% is still low enough for most adults to not notice.

As for shelf stability the FDA deems a pH of 4.6 or below shelf stable. I was a bit of chemistry nerd in high school, and I remember that pH can be finicky so I'm building in a bit of a safety factor and aiming for a pH or 4.2 or below. I know carbonation lowers pH, but I didn't know by how much, and wasn't certain how hops or tea played into that equation. The commercially available hop teas and waters only have carbonated water, hops, and citric acid, so I figured I'd do the same, and purchased some ascorbic acid (vitamin C), citric acid, and some wine making pH strips (for accuracy at low pH). After speaking with a water treatment chemist, the best practice when using acid powders is to start with distilled water, although tap is okay in a pinch, and acidify a small volume to a very low pH, and then add that volume to the brew water. Using the high school chemistry equation of M1V1+M2V2 = M3(V1+V2) you can determine how much of your first solution is required to achieve your desired molarity, and thereby the pH.

But then it crossed my mind that if the result would be shelf stable, would my yeast die before carbonation was achieved. The champagne yeast I had purchased had a technical data sheet, but didn't mention viable pH ranges, but the folks at Lallemand Brewing helped me out and confirmed that the yeast while most effective between pHs of 5.2-4.2 was viable between 6.0-3.0 and could push those ranges even further, but then fermentation would slow.

Armed with this knowledge I made a micro batch of 6 bottles with citra hops and white tea. Everything went smoothly, but the result was lackluster. For the first batch I acidified exclusively with ascorbic acid, which gave the tea a lemon vibe. That would be all well and good, but the other tea and hop flavors were almost not existent. The tea is very delicate and meant to play a supporting role, but even it was notably over diluted. The hops however were basically not present at all. The nose had some citra vibes, but it did not translate into any noticeable flavor. The next batch needed a much bigger hop punch. The carbonation was spot on though.

For the second attempt I made a few changes. First I increased the batch size to 12L, doubled the hops, and reduced tea dilution for 50% to 25% (according to its brewing instructions). Secondly, I decided to brew a hop water at the same time. I had gotten my hands on some Simcoe hop extract, and figured it was a good time to experiment to see if extracts had any noticeable effect on the brewing process or flavor.

Both brews went fairly well, though going back to back took a good chunk of time. Lots of good lessons learned, but none seemed to jeopardize the brew.

 
LINKS

Citra White Hop Tea
Brew Log

Simcoe Hop Water

Saturday, May 25, 2019

BREW DAY XXI: Fumigator - Session III

Fumigator season returns, following a year off in 2018.

The grain (& zest) bill were left untouched, but I simplified the mash schedule in favor of a single infusion, with a few temperature correcting additions. This session was mainly focused on enjoying the process, as we had the family visit and participate in the session.


 
LINKS

Brew Log
* The mash schedule used for this session differs from main recipe page

Saturday, December 8, 2018

BREW DAY XX: Thunderhead - Session II

Following another extended hiatus the fermentors are seeing action once again. 

To keep things simple, I revisited my California Common recipe. I overhauled the grain bill to create a more simple recipe and hopefully gain a better understanding the flavor contributions of Maris Otter and Special Roast. Furthermore, I simplified the mash schedule in favor of a single infusion, with a few temperature correcting additions. 

During this brew session, I continued my emphasis on efficiency. Using blankets and a targeted space-heater I made a focused effort to reduce mash tun heat loss despite chilling temperatures. I was a bit overconfident and built the recipe around a 65% efficiency, but was only able to increase my efficiency to 60%. However, the resulting beer remains in-spec for a California Common, just with a slightly suppressed ABV.

LINKS
Brew Log
* Recipe used for this session differs from main recipe page

Saturday, October 28, 2017

BREW DAY XIX: The Full Mountie - Session II

After a seventeen month drought, the fermentors are finally bubbling again. 

In order to help shake off my rusty brewing skills, I made a few alterations to the Full Mountie recipe from two years back. Maris Otter was replaced with standard 2-row, and the entire bourbon/oak steps were left out. Additionally, the grain bill was increased to compensate for my historically poor brewing efficiency, and I adjusted my rest-temp calculator to more effectively compensate for inevitable heat losses that occur during the mash.

During this brew session, I had a strong focus on efficiency. I wrapped my mash tun in blankets to reduce heat loss, and rigorously monitored my mash and lautering temps. I was quite successful, raising my efficiency from a measly 42.7% to 55.8%. 


LINKS
Brew Log
* Recipe used for this session differs from main recipe page

Wednesday, June 1, 2016

BREW DAY XVIII: Fumigator - Session III

Spring cannot conclude until I have brewed my annual batch of Fumigator. It's getting pretty late into the season, but I managed to squeak it in before May bid farewell.

I only made one change to the grain bill this time around, substituting pale malt for 2-row. While I was purchasing my grains, I couldn't figure out why I had used pale malt for this beer in the past as it doesn't really fit the style. So instead of blindly following my past, and less experienced self, I converted to 2-row as my primary base malt.

The rest of brew day all went according to plan. I hit my mash temps and times, made sure to lauter long and slow, and managed to hit my gravity window, though it was a bit on the low end. To compensate for this slightly low BG, I boiled a bit more vigorously, but perhaps overly so, as I ended with only 4.8 gallons in the primary. 

Also, I should note that the hops were a bit on the low side in terms of AA%. And due to a busy week, I wasn't able to throw together a yeast starter, so I pitched directly from the slap pouch.

Despite flying solo for this session, brew day was a success.


LINKS
Brew Log 


Wednesday, May 4, 2016

BEER-BQ

I haven't brewed since my New Year dunkelweizen session, but I have found new ways to scratch the itch. Springtime is here, and its time to bust out the grill. The burgers and brats are begging to be thrown on the fire, and its about time we oblige them. Its grill season.

Not many things capture the summertime spirit better than a grill. Be it gas or charcoal (sorry, purists), grills let you slow down, put your feet up, and throw some beers back. But, instead of just drinking while turning your wursts, lets pay it forward, and give those wursts a drink.

I have been working on three, let's call them sauces, to help beer-ify your summertime grub.

Recipes

P.S. May the fourth be with all you Star Wars fans.

Saturday, April 23, 2016

REINHEITSGEBOT QUINCENTENNIAL

Half Millenium. Five Centuries. Eight Batmen (Batmans?). Forty Nine Olympic Games. Six Thousand One Hundred Eighty Four Lunar Cycles. Billions of Beers.

The Reinheitsgebot, or German Beer Purity Law, turns five hundred today! The most well-known and influential beer related legislation has changed a bit (read: a ton) since its first signing, but most know of its original form.
"...we wish to emphasize that in future in all cities, markets and in the country, the only ingredients used for the brewing of beer must be Barley, Hops, and Water. Whosoever knowingly disregards or transgresses upon this ordinance, shall be punished by the Court authorities' confiscating such barrels of beer without fail." - Bavarian Reinheitsgebot of 1516.
Now, any good beer-lover should be screaming, "Yeast! Silly Germans, forgot about the yeast!" and they'd have a point. Surprisingly, yeast wasn't added as a permissible ingredient until the 1800s. And now any great beer-lover should be screaming, "What about hefes and dunkels? Those are German!" and they'd be right, too. Wheat, coriander, and oddly enough, bay leaf, were added the to law less than a century into its life.

Although the name sounds well intended, the purity law was more about economics than beer, and can be viewed very differently based on your 1516 trade and location. The order was written to prevent competition with bakers for wheat and rye (two ingredients modern brewers are familiar with), in hopes to secure affordable and stable bread prices. Additives commonly used in North Germany were also nixed, which helped secure market presence for Bavarian brewers. Also, many blame the Reinheitsgebot for the extinction and limitation of many German beer styles. Pilseners became top-dog in the years following the law, while regional beer styles like Kölsch and Altbier barely survived. The strictness of the law also slowed innovation and adoption in Germany.

All of this sounds pretty bad, and one might wonder why the Reinheitsgebot is still around. Fear not, dear reader, German brewers are fighting back. Nils Klawitter wrote an interesting two-parter about the ensuing battles and uncertain future of this long standing code, in a true craft brewer revolution.

Despite the Reinheitsgebot, and its questionable motives, beer has endured. Take a minute today to sit down and enjoy some German suds, and be proud of those suds, because those suds have survived five hundred years of tyranny and oppression.